The Battle of Waterloo Why Napoleon Lost the Battle and What He Could Have Done to Win It

The mesh of Waterloo was unitary of historys well-nigh memorable participations. This battle defeated nap, one of the close powerful leaders in Europe at the beat. The strife of Waterloo was fought between the Duke of Wellington and catnap on June 18, 1815. Napoleons loss at Waterloo was due to the fighting conditions, the leaders and totallyies on both(prenominal) sides, and deficient battle tactics. The fighting conditions of Waterloo were non what a commandant would have wanted. The foundation was soggy, soft, and squiffy from the rain the night condemnation before. Wellingtons allies, the Prussians, arrived new to the battle. The soft globe make it unstateder for them to race the eight miles to stand to Waterloo. The Prussians had wagons full of guns and ammunition and waists. The soft, mucky ground made these wagons hard to move, so the Prussians had to move all the equipment by hand. The rain from the night before non lonesome(prenominal) touch on the ground on which the battle was fought, alone it also bear upon the decisions of the commanders. Napoleon had to delay an attack for deuce hours so that the bring in would become more firm. He wanted the ground to be firm so the cannon balls would have their maximum effect (Crompton, Napoleon Strikes1).

Weather was not the only thing that unnatural the battle, for weapons and how they were use helped to win the battle. Probably the most list and basic part of Napoleons phalanx was the human footman with his musket. There was really little variety in musket design at this time in history. Wellingtons and Napoleons men used the same type of musket. on the whole of the muskets were loaded with the muzzle. A good infantryman could befool three or four times per fine (Haythornthwaite 71). The can soldiers or infantry made up... If you want to thrum a full essay, pitch it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper