Has Widgets, Inc. Violated The Civil Rights Act?

The case here is whether or Susan can rightfully get into that the regulations of Widgets , Inc , requiring height and pack requirements constitutes discrimination in violation of the living of the Civil Rights effect . An examination of the facts reveals that Widget justifies its regulations on keister that there is a need for these requirements in to carry issue the job . The specifications are to ensure that the delivery drivers are run into to carry to load of their deliveries efficiently and effectively without causing unjustified stress or danger to its employees .

The claim of Susan , on the differently hand , can be assumed to be swinish on the fact that this is discriminatory as she claims that height and establishment of system of burdenss are not essential requisites for carrying out the job and and and then are preventing her from being gainfully employed , contrary to the eatable of the Civil Rights serve which does not allow for arbitrary weight and height requirementsSusan s claim has no basis unless it can be proven that the weight and height requirements were made arbitrarily . The equity is clear that requirements can be specified especially as qualifications for a job when it can be shown that these are half(prenominal) arbitrary nor discriminatory so as to constitute a violation of the Civil Rights Act . As ruled by the court in the case of Dothard v Rawlinson , arbitrary weight and height requiremen ts run contrary to the spirit of the Civil R! ights Act and the Equal Opportunity Laws because they prevent otherwise...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper