Analysis of Documentary ” the End of the Line”

The abolish of the line The end of the line is a part of a new wave of documentaries that non unless seek prizes at Film Festival and wasnt equitable primarily make to make m singley but change the opinions of loads of tidy sum. What is happening to the demesne weight stocks is an under reported issue and extirpate of the Line seeks to address this problem and make the issue reportable. The fill was enjoin by Rupert Murray and narrated by Ted Danson. But the whole ingest is based on a book By Charles Clover himself a black cat who tells us ab break through(predicate) his gaiety when he first caught a big cracking salmon .Other researchers , scientists and just angleermen travel around the world to get people to pay attention to the problem of factory look for which has reduced and made some fish species extinct . In many ways this film is like a funeral for fish . The scientists predict that if we continue fishing as we argon at once , we will see the end of most se afood by 2048 . The film takes us around the fishing world to the places like Alaska , Canada , Senegal and Bahamas . The film presentation is less like an investigation but more(prenominal) about discovering the guilty criminals because of which fish is disappearing .The film defines them and we listen to expert witnesses who explains us about why those people atomic number 18 guilty . The documentary opens on a colourful ecosystem that immerses us into the beauty of the underwater world , shows us how this world swarming with life and how it is full of various kinds of fish . Credits calmly fade in and out of the picture as beautiful fish dart in and out of coral reefs, filling the screen with happiness and vibrancy. The credits finish ringlet and the music that has been playing in the telescope transforms from cheerful to suspenseful and dramatic .Drab, gray colors suddenly deputize the bright ones, and short scenes begin to flash in sync with the music. co privational boa ts charge through the sea like a tank rolling into a battlefield. A fishermans silhouette appears and he brandishes a knife, plunghing it into a flopping fish. Red, vibrant blood squirts e reallywhere, til now splashing onto the screen, and it drips from the knife of the fisherman . Quick cuts , dramatic close-ups , emotional music , and vivid details be all characteristics of this film .Colors and music in this documentary , that were mentiod earlier , are directed to convey a message of hatred and disgust towards anglers , even before a single word is said . The violent shots of fish being hit in the head, nets filled with flopping fish (complete with an unpleasant slapping sound), and knives creating burbling stab wounds in huge tuna are accompanied by slow, dramatic music and music that could be straight from a disgust movie. One shot from within an underwater net shows a fewer fish with panicked faces, eyes wide, and mouths open, lunging toward the camera as if screaming, Let me out . In this film , fish is occasionally personified , making people that are shown in scenes at sushi restaurants while eating seafood and talking about how they enthral eating it and how they love fish , in interviews is represented as they are cannibalistic fish murderers . The diction in this film is mostly voice-over and interviewees . The defined attempt of voice-over is to manipulate the emotions of audience . What about the interwiewees , many of them are very passionate about the issues presented in this documentary , and it shows in the word election that they use .In the interviews what they do is that they are encouraging and persuading people to stop down fish in such big amounts as we do now , to stop fishing ilegally or reduce catch of fish , to restrain this tradegy , otherwise we will see the end of seafood . They also represent us the statistics that are intimidating . Those statistics and interwievs create a horrifying atmosphere and biliousness . T he method of this film is to shock audience . This is the great move to use up people , because it is a shock and fear that makes people be more serious and change the way they think and their worldview .And the dramatic music only feeds those tinctureings . As it was mentioned earlier the film takes part in different separate of the world . For example in Africa the fishing business is very wellspring developed , but as they were asborbing and catching fish in great(p) quantities this led them to a shotage of fish as well as to the loss of line of businesss . Since fish and fishing itself for them is one of the most important kinds of food and job , many fishermen were forced to go to Europe to infiltrate their families . And this is already one of the examples that the fish is being extincted .Another example that fish is being extincted is that some corporations and fishermen roam because they can and dont get caught . In the documentary , a passionate Mielgo described the role of Mitsubishi thats located in lacquer in the decline of bluefin tuna . He believes the company is have got bluefin for the day when the species will be extinct and the price of their super regarded flesh will skyrocket. The bluefin situation demonstrates what multinational corporations, international fishing policy, and consumer demand can do to a wild species.The film gives us a lot of information, using statistics, scientists, fishermen, and people associated with the fishing industry, which makes us feel truthfully about this film and believe it and to take their message and really try to make a difference in the underwater world . All in all the main social function of this film is to give-up the ghost people , to make them to imagine an ocean without fish . surmise their meals without seafood . Imagine the global consequences . To show that this is the future if we do not stop , the purpose is to make people think and act wisely .