Landmark Supreme Court Decisions Essay -- essays research papers

Landmark Supreme approach DecisionsAbout 32 days ago, in December of 1965, a group of adults and studentsfrom Des Moines, Iowa ga thered to fork out their dislike towards Americaninvolvement in the Vietnam War. They obdurate to birth disastrous armbands and fast onDecember 16 and 31 to record there point. When the principals of the DesMoines develop System found out their plans, they decided to ward off any unmatched whotook part in this type of protest. On December 16 - 17 three Tinker siblingsand several of their friends were suspended for wearing the armbands. altogether ofthem did non return to school until after New Years Day. playing by with(predicate) theirparents, the Tinkers and just about former(a) students went to the Federal District Court,asking for an enjoining to be issued by Iowa. This court refused the idea,forcing them to take the crusade to the Supreme Court. afterwards auditory sense their consequence,the Supreme Court agreed with the Tinkers. They state that wearing inexorablearmbands was a silent form of manner and that students do not look at to infractup their first Amendment respectables at school. This landmark Supreme Court case wasknown as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District.From the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. School Board obviously camesome contrary viewpoints about the armbands. The school board said that noone has the domineering right to immunity of expression, where the Tinkers said thatonly banning armbands and not other governmental symbols was unconstitutional. Theschool board said that the armbands were disruptive to the teaching environment,where the Tinkers said they were not. Finally, the school board said that orderin the classroom, where political statement should be discussed, is entitledto constitutional protection. The Tinkers believed that the armbands were wornas the students views, and indeed should be constitutionally protected andrespected by the school. Thes e were all central arguments in the case.Personally, I agree with the Supreme Courts decision to uphold the 1stAmendment rights of the students in school. Why shouldnt students have thesame rights as other nation? If the students wore prurient clothing, ran out ofclassrooms, or set the school on send word in protest of the war, then yes, I couldsee disciplinary actio... ...chool districts.In contrast, the clip periods in which these cases took place were very variant. In the 1960s, the war in Vietnam was qualifying on, and there were a lotof contr oversial issues and viewpoints facing students at schools. In the1980s, the war was over and there werent as many arguable issues skirt students rights. One case involved granting immunity of expression through aschool newspaper, the other through articles of clothing, but the major discrimination betwixt the two cases were the decisions made by the U.S. SupremeCourt. They agreed with the Tinkers in the article of faith that fre edom of expressionthrough armbands was okay. However, they disagreed with Cathy Kuhlmeiersbelief in freedom of expression through a so-called public forum.As a student, I believe that freedom of expression is one of our most of import rights. Without this right people wont know who we are they wontunderstand our generation. Because of the many different definitions of freedomof expression, people will always be in affray over them. Lets hope thatour school district never faces a worry as big as the ones presented in thispaper. Landmark Supreme Court Decisions strain -- essays research papers Landmark Supreme Court DecisionsAbout 32 years ago, in December of 1965, a group of adults and studentsfrom Des Moines, Iowa equanimous to show their dislike towards Americaninvolvement in the Vietnam War. They decided to wear black armbands and fast onDecember 16 and 31 to express there point. When the principals of the DesMoines School System found out their plans, they de cided to suspend anyone whotook part in this type of protest. On December 16 - 17 three Tinker siblingsand several of their friends were suspended for wearing the armbands. All ofthem did not return to school until after New Years Day. Acting through theirparents, the Tinkers and some other students went to the Federal District Court,asking for an injunction to be issued by Iowa. This court refused the idea,forcing them to take the case to the Supreme Court. After hearing their case,the Supreme Court agreed with the Tinkers. They said that wearing blackarmbands was a silent form of expression and that students do not have to giveup their 1st Amendment rights at school. This landmark Supreme Court case wasknown as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District.From the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. School Board obviously camesome conflicting viewpoints about the armbands. The school board said that noone has the absolute right to freedom of expression, where the Tinkers said th atonly banning armbands and not other political symbols was unconstitutional. Theschool board said that the armbands were disruptive to the learning environment,where the Tinkers said they were not. Finally, the school board said that orderin the classroom, where political controversy should be discussed, is entitledto constitutional protection. The Tinkers believed that the armbands were wornas the students views, and therefore should be constitutionally protected andrespected by the school. These were all important arguments in the case.Personally, I agree with the Supreme Courts decision to uphold the 1stAmendment rights of the students in school. Why shouldnt students have thesame rights as other people? If the students wore obscene clothing, ran out ofclassrooms, or set the school on fire in protest of the war, then yes, I couldsee disciplinary actio... ...chool districts.In contrast, the time periods in which these cases took place were verydifferent. In the 1960s, the war in Vietnam was going on, and there were a lotof controversial issues and viewpoints facing students at schools. In the1980s, the war was over and there werent as many controversial issuessurrounding students rights. One case involved freedom of expression through aschool newspaper, the other through articles of clothing, but the majordifference between the two cases were the decisions made by the U.S. SupremeCourt. They agreed with the Tinkers in the belief that freedom of expressionthrough armbands was okay. However, they disagreed with Cathy Kuhlmeiersbelief in freedom of expression through a so-called public forum.As a student, I believe that freedom of expression is one of our mostimportant rights. Without this right people wont know who we are they wontunderstand our generation. Because of the many different definitions of freedomof expression, people will always be in controversy over them. Lets hope thatour school district never faces a problem as big as the ones presented in t hispaper.